Confusion in the child pornography law hair nude Rie Miyazawa, amended by indigestion (J-CAST News)
2009-07-04 00:48:48
Council on amendment of the law against child pornography, including disputes over the collection of hair nude photo of Mr. Miyazawa Rie. The bill submitted by the then ruling party, in his blog, he said they were misunderstood, and criticized the Democratic proposal. In this confusion, the vote to correct or true.â submit a bill on the blog "misunderstood" and appealingWhat is child pornography, or otherwise -. Rie Miyazawa is 17 and has taken years of age (36) Photos of the "Santa Fe". 2009 June 26, the boards of the Lower House Legal Committee, it became a hot topic in newspapers and online.The Hanashi Yasuhiro member of the Liberal Democratic Party who submitted the bill, as his remarks were misunderstood, in his blog on July 2, is engaged in a rebuttal.èæ¢¨members, a photo book that's a profit of misinformation and some newspapers have said the case was disposed of within a year. Himself is unable to determine whether child pornography have not seen, "a blunt answer that was not done," he said. For information on the Internet and newspapers, "even by a misunderstanding," he said.However, the Democratic Party is vague in the definition of child pornography, if you walk through "Abu Nye" substantialæJITA.But in the end only the description of the membersèæ¢¨, "Santa Fe" is not child pornography or not clear. The bureau responded that they would return to the House of Representatives, "I think Santa Fe is the current law, child pornography is at the outside." This is would be considered child pornography will still be there. Indeed, who submitted his own bill, in this blog "that apply to child pornography, will even out how the famous actress," he said.However, according to newspapers, the Democratic Party and the ruling coalition talks with two modifications, theæ©MIå¯TTA to each other, agreed that today's session of the National Assembly. However, in a state of confusion, or to curb the situation which is not visible.â increase the attorney to violate the freedom of expressionThe draft ruling is about child pornography, and no changes to the definition of current law. It was and nudity of the child, "to excite sexual desire, stimulate," he said.If the definition of the ruling party, whether it be certified and all nude. Okumura Tetsu lawyers familiar with the problem, and based on precedent, explains."Large genitalia photographs, films or long-handled, and can flip over a decent showing genitals, or if you pose in indecent sensational. And, yes in some cases have seen a lot of naked girls "However, nudity and for family and medical records are excluded.And if this precedent, "Santa Fe", is out to child pornography. "We are not exposed to the hip and is not open, and stimulate the sex drive is unthinkable."However, Okumura attorney, if the possessionç¦JIRE simple as getting a lot of conflict with the freedom of expression than ever before, indicating a sense of fear and ready to enact.â ArticlesMiyazawa Rie hair nude photo of child pornography if taken at age 17? : 2009-06-29Adult Games and Animation "no", "violate freedom of expression" and the backlash: 2009-06-1416-year-old mature woman, 18 years old BABAA? Radical "Swimsuit DVD" market: 2007-10-17"Child pornography taken to relatives" to eliminate the damage was ... ...: 2008-05-22Taxi drivers lament! Bicycle "The mobile operation": 2009-07-03
Bookmark
digg |
reddit |
del.icio.us |
dzone |
Hatena
Related Articles
|
|